PDA

View Full Version : SA Rugby on the up &...oh my!


TiGeR
05-16-2007, 03:39 PM
Up to you all to decide what you feel about this but my PERSONAL 5 cents is this: SA Rugby were RIGHT to include the player on the basis of his ABILITY & form over the past 2/3 seasons...they were WRONG to not let the coach & selectors know BEFORE they did it! Jake White & the selectors are WRONG to put personal issues before professional ones in leaving him out- the argument that he "doesnt fit their game plan" & he "isnt a lineout option" dont wash when you consider that they picked Kabamba Floors...

My PROFESSIONAL 5 cents is: "No comment"...:smiley2:

John Robbie: Well only in South African can we have a fabulous weekend like we have had. Two wins in the Super 14 semi-finals, which means we have won the cup, we've won it. We don't even have to worry about the final. Whichever team you want, your favourite team will be in the final, and then of course we get this unbelievable news, that Jake White (http://www.whoswhosa.co.za/Pages/profilefull.aspx?IndID=5408) selects his squad for the training squad. This is for the Springboks. This is the squad he is going to be accountable for. He specifically does not pick Luke Watson, and we know that he has a problem from the rugby point of view with Luke Watson, only to discover that the presidency has selected Luke Watson into the squad. Well this goes against just about everything in international rugby, in rugby. You've got a coach, and you've got selectors, and they pick the team.
Well on the line the man who was involved in that decision, president of Saru, Oregon Hoskins. Oregan joins us from Durban. Oregan thank you for talking to us and good morning.
Oregon Hoskins: Hello John.
John Robbie: Is it true that Jake did not pick Watson, and you guys did?
Oregon Hoskins: Yes.
John Robbie: Doesn't that make a mockery of the whole idea of having a selection panel?
Oregon Hoskins: I have just spoken to your sister station in Cape Town, Cape Talk, and they totally disagree with you.
John Robbie: Well I don't care about that Regan, doesn't it make a mockery of having a selection panel?
Oregon Hoskins: John that's, of course you are entitled to your opinion, I don't agree with you.
John Robbie: So why do you have a selection panel if they don't select the team?
Oregon Hoskins: John obviously you know... It's an unprecedented move, and it's not something that I would like to see happen again.
John Robbie: Why not?
Oregon Hoskins: Because as you said, the coaches and the selectors are there to do their job, but we believe here that we have a situation that is not tenable. We have a player who was a Super 14 player of the year in 2006. Has played well enough in 2007 to warrant selection to the training camp, has not been selected and we have done what we did.
John Robbie: But Bradley Barrett has had a fantastic season. Derick Hougaard has just scored points, has taken the Bulls in the most magnificent way to the final. Should we put them in, Oregan?
Oregon Hoskins: No.
John Robbie: Why not?
Oregon Hoskins: Were they the Super 14 players of the year last year?
John Robbie: But that was last year, Oregan.
Oregon Hoskins: Yes, but Luke Watson has had a fantastic Super 14 season in 2007, John.
John Robbie: But it's the principle Oregan, surely. Every single rugby fan in this country believes he can pick a better team and a better squad than the coach. I mean that's what sport is...
Oregon Hoskins: Have you solicited the rugby people's view on this matter?
John Robbie: But that's irrelevant, Oregan.
Oregon Hoskins: You just referred to that fact, John.
John Robbie: Yes, but everybody thinks they can pick a squad.
Oregon Hoskins: No, not everybody, we are talking about popular opinion, John.
John Robbie: But are you therefore saying that popular opinion selects the squad?
Oregon Hoskins: No, no, no, I am saying at times popular opinion is correct.
John Robbie: But then why not have a vote for a team. Why not do away with selectors, we can use the internet and vote the team in, Oregan.
Oregon Hoskins: Well look John, you have heard what our situation is, and what more do you want me to say?
John Robbie: I mean, I would like you to stand up... I mean how can you say Oregan, that you don't want the situation to happen again. You have basically said that it's unprecedented, that you have agreed with me that this goes against the whole principle of having a selection committee, and yet you are still justifying it. I can't believe it.
Oregon Hoskins: Okay, what more do you want me to say John Robbie?
John Robbie: Well what are you going to do to Jake White now, if Luke Watson, having got into this squad, performs badly? If he is disruptive to the squad, if whatever reason, surely now Jake White cannot be accountable for the performance of a team that hasn't been selected by himself?
Oregon Hoskins: What do you think we are going to do to Jake White?
John Robbie: Well I am amazed that Jake White hasn't resigned. I mean you've basically said to Jake White, you coach a side and you select a side, and then you are responsible for the side. But now what you have basically said is that you are not good enough to do it. We are going to... we know more about rugby than you do.
Oregon Hoskins: No.
John Robbie: That's basically what you are saying Oregan, isn't it?
Oregon Hoskins: John, this is a training squad for this team of 45 or 46 players, a training squad.
John Robbie: Yes, a Springbok training squad.
Oregon Hoskins: It is not the team itself, for number one.
John Robbie: But forgive me Oregan, but Jake White is responsible for training the Springbok team, is he not? But he's not responsible enough to have his squad selected by him?
Oregon Hoskins: As a principle, yes, I agree with you.
John Robbie: So you have gone against principle?
Oregon Hoskins: Yes.
John Robbie: Why?
Oregon Hoskins: But I have just told you, and I am not going to repeat what I said to you earlier on, and the reason is that we think that the player Luke Watson is good enough to be in the training squad. We believe that the coach and the two National selectors are wrong. We believe that's its time that the player was given an opportunity to be in the training squad, and we stand by that.
John Robbie: Okay, so you have gone against principle now. Is this not a dangerous precedent, Oregan?
Oregon Hoskins: It is.
John Robbie: So even though you are telling me again, that it's only a training squad, so therefore by... you are suggesting that it's not all that important. It's not like putting him in the side; you have basically created this dangerous precedent, and gone against your principles.
Oregon Hoskins: Well you know, time will tell, John.
John Robbie: But this is what you are telling me, though Oregan.
Oregon Hoskins: John Robbie, you and I must have this conversation again in the near future, and then we can revisit the consequences of this decision, and let's make a date now. Let's talk about this in two to three months time.
John Robbie: Why do you say that? Why is that important?
Oregon Hoskins: Well it's important because time will judge whether you are wrong, or I am wrong.
John Robbie: But I am right in terms of the principle. You have agreed. Surely it's about principle, when you are the Saru president, the president of the South African Rugby Union, and you are basically telling me that you are not going to stick to your principles. That worries me, Oregan.
Oregon Hoskins: John you have a view and I have a view, and, you know, time will tell...
John Robbie: But Oregan we have agreed on that, we...
Oregon Hoskins: Agreed on what?
John Robbie: We have agreed that you have not stuck to your principles.
Oregon Hoskins: John, you see John you want to agree, you want to talk about ethics and principles all the time, and you are always on the high ground, because you are the expert on rugby, and nobody else knows the game of rugby.
John Robbie: But no Oregan...
Oregon Hoskins: And that's you, that's John Robbie.
John Robbie: No, Oregan you are saying...
Oregon Hoskins: No, John Robbie knows the game, you are the expert in this country, and nobody else knows the game of rugby. You are the expert, you are the man, and your view takes precedent...
John Robbie: No, you are wrong.
Oregon Hoskins: And if there is anybody else in the world, and Mr John Robbie is rugby persae. Personified as the man, the greatest, the best, he knows and nobody else is entitled to a view.
John Robbie: Oregan, your...
Oregon Hoskins: I am sorry Mr Robbie.
John Robbie: Oregan you are playing the man, and not the ball, Oregan.
Oregon Hoskins: No, no, no Mr Robbie...
John Robbie: You are Oregan...
Oregon Hoskins: For once you need to understand that other people also have a view in the game. We can also hold a ball and play the ball and not the man. And it's not just John Robbie who has a view that prevails against everybody and I disagree with you and you need to also allow other people to have views on the game of rugby. You are not the only expert in the world, I am sorry.
John Robbie: Regan, we are all agreed on different views. You are the one who is putting people into the squad who weren't selected. That's the difference, Oregan.
Oregon Hoskins: No, no, no, but you are coming across as you the expert, and you are the only one who has all the answers for the game of rugby.
John Robbie: Oregan I am a big fan of yours, and you have just disappointed me.
Oregon Hoskins: John you said that for a lot of other people as well, so it doesn't bother me.
John Robbie: Oregan, you are the one...
Oregon Hoskins: You said about other rugby leaders as well, that you are their man, and then all of a sudden you are no longer their man, so I actually wonder whether you stick to your word.
John Robbie: Oregan, thank you for talking to us.
Oregon Hoskins: Well, okay, thank you John, have a good day.
John Robbie: Bye-bye Oregan Hoskins, Saru president.

sally
05-16-2007, 05:35 PM
missed you tiger!!

barto11
05-16-2007, 05:45 PM
bit daft really....apparently some sa govt official said yesterday that watsen was considered as a "black" player....how crappy must he be feeling right now to know that probably his life's dream has just come true and now it's been shattered because he wasnt seleted by the coach???

TiGeR
05-17-2007, 10:40 AM
He wasnt expecting to be selected by this coach... thats the tragedy of the whole thing- there are personal issues that are clouding coaches 7 selectors' judgement...

barto11
05-17-2007, 10:43 AM
rumours flying around that he is too small, will get absolutely destroyed in international rugby...disagree, he was by far the stormers best forward and tried to go forward in a pack that was going backwards...another rumour was that he slept with jake's wife??

biffon
05-17-2007, 01:16 PM
Well i have to be honest i havent been watching him this year so cant comment on form but lets look at Aus rugby for example...(probably not a good idea but still)

Mattie henjak - Arguably the most in-form Halfback behind gregan Australia have got but he never got the nod infact Joh Connolly picked 5... yes 5 other halfbacks in front of him.... has to be personal there is not other way he could not have been picked!!

another one: Jeremy Paul - Australias Best Hooker .. hands down!! and hes been overlooked for the squad...

both of those players if general public had their way, would be in the final 22 at least, but the players and the public and the government have agreed in that it is the selectors final say and thats it......



this is a Dangerous precedent that Oregon has made and it will sting to the heart of Rugby in South Africa as never before!

barto11
05-17-2007, 03:05 PM
not sure why paul has been left out....arguably the best hooker aus has to offer, but with henjak there disciplinary issues surronding him a few years back...its going to take the back of connolly to get him into the side....

Plus he looks like a muppet...

TiGeR
05-18-2007, 11:39 AM
rumours flying around that he is too small, will get absolutely destroyed in international rugby...disagree, he was by far the stormers best forward and tried to go forward in a pack that was going backwards...another rumour was that he slept with jake's wife??

ha ha ha! Thats the BEST one i've heard so far! Slept with his wife! he he he! Interesting that so many have fallen for the bullshit about Jake White & the bok selectors' reason for not picking Luke Watson- if he is 'too small' & doesnt give them a lineout option & they dont believe in a 'fetcher'/ traditional openside flanker, then WHY did they pick Kabamba Floors? If they needed to make up quotas there was Solly Tybilika (who is STILL a contracted Springbok!) Adi Jacobs, Conrad Jantjies, Lawrence Sephaka (even though he is SHYTE!) to name a few...the S14 stats from two different non South African franchises show that Luke Watson was the competition's no. 1 flanker in terms of ball carrying metres gained, turnovers & completed tackles... he also won more lineouts than a few of the tall boys selected in the squad...all in a team that didnt exactly set the world alight this S14.

barto11
05-18-2007, 11:52 AM
which sought of goes to the old saying its easy to look good in a poor team(see also wikus v heerden before moving to bulls) which definatly shows he can play ball, if jake didnt want to pick its easy to see why with the quality and quantity of loose forwards in SA, he deserves his chance but what SARU did was completly wrong...he's still only 23(??) and along with Brad Barritt will get his chance one day

TiGeR
05-18-2007, 12:19 PM
Quantity & quality??? You watch the same S14 as me? You call Danie Roussouw (who is too slow to even be a blind side flank!) a good loosie? Wikus was good but so would I be in THAT Bulls pack! :smiley36: Jaques Botes was ok, Floors was consistent, Smith was hot & cold, Schalk was more quiet than usual...

Statistically, Stormers loose forward Luke Watson is currently the form player of the southern hemisphere.

That's according to the measure of the fantasyrugby.com, a website that offers rugby fans an opportunity to select a Super 14 team and then compete with that selection against other fans, by measuring the various fans' fantasy sides based on the statistical performance of the players.

Players are given points for tries scored, goals kicked, tackles made, defenders beaten, turnovers won, clean lineouts as well as providing assistance in another's scoring of a try.

Points are deducted for a missed goal kick, ball turned over to opposition and penalties conceded.

With the assistance of avid reader Tim Colmer, Rugby365 accessed the statistics for this year's fantasy league.

Watson is the player who amassed the most points in this year's Super 14.

Watson has been rated the top loose forward before in the competition, and this year saw him become the most valuable player to select in your own personal fantasy team.

For the statistically-minded Springbok coach Jake White this perhaps confirms that there are more than rugby issues steering the current controversy around the national camp in Bloemfontein

barto11
05-18-2007, 12:24 PM
Wikus has always been good, Pier Speis played well when he came back, Botes(stastically apperntly) made the most forward tackles in the comp, Smith and Schalk are quality, even tho neither had a great season...I made a comment elsewhere that Botes should be considered for bok selection, and was told that every side has 3 decent loosies, and when you look at it, its true...

TiGeR
05-18-2007, 12:52 PM
I made a comment elsewhere that Botes should be considered for bok selection, and was told that every side has 3 decent loosies, and when you look at it, its true...

Stormers had the best loose trio in SA this season both performance wise & statistically (Sharks were close second, followed by the Lions (! thats what i said!) &THEN the Bulls & Cheetahs... big difference is that the Stormers got nailed in the tight five...BADLY sometimes! Spies was good & is a no. 8 so he, Joe van Niekerk & Bob Skinstad SHOULD be fighting for the no,. 8 Bok jersey... the best no. 7 (which is Blindside in SA) is Schalk by a country mile & then no matter what the pundits say, form & stats show that Luke Watson is the best no. 6... either option at 8, plus Schalk & two locks give you 4 lineout options- if you cant win your own ball with that many jumpers as a team/ coach then you shouldnt be at this level...

barto11
05-18-2007, 01:51 PM
Tiger...I cannot agree with you any more...

biffon
06-26-2007, 08:55 AM
yes you can ... agree to disagree like i do :D

personally i think Tiger is on the money... besides WHY do you want a 6"6' lineout option playing as a flanker anyway? Luke Watson is a class player and im just sorry he's injured and wasnt selected to Tour as im sure he would have proved his worth in spades